Core i9-10900KF vs i5-12400
Description
The i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 825.5 k points while the i5-12400 gets 544.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.5 times faster than the i5-12400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 825.5 k points while the i5-12400 gets 544.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.5 times faster than the i5-12400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
90672
Core
Comet Lake-S
Arder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
10/20
6/12
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
18432 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
90.37k points
102.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
825.47k points
544.64k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900KF
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
35.87k
48.08k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
31.43k
25.6k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.34k
14.02k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.73k
14.81k (x0.94)
TOTAL
90.37k
102.51k (x1.13)
Multithread
i9-10900KF
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
377.56k
230.14k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
347.59k
198.07k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
88.08k
94.78k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.24k
21.64k (x1.77)
TOTAL
825.47k
544.64k (x0.66)
Performance/W
i9-10900KF
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
3020 points/W
3541 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2781 points/W
3047 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
705 points/W
1458 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
98 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
6604 points/W
8379 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10900KF
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
6898 points/GHz
10927 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6044 points/GHz
5819 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1411 points/GHz
3186 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3025 points/GHz
3365 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
23298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4