Core i9-10900KF vs i9-11900H
Description
The i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 825.5 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.4 times faster than the i9-11900H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 825.5 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.4 times faster than the i9-11900H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
806d1
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
10/20
8/16
TDP
125 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
90.37k points
89.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
825.47k points
584.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900KF
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
35.87k
33.38k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
31.43k
27.12k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.34k
11.69k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.73k
17k (x1.08)
TOTAL
90.37k
89.19k (x0.99)
Multithread
i9-10900KF
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
377.56k
249.83k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
347.59k
237.26k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
88.08k
84.18k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.24k
13.2k (x1.08)
TOTAL
825.47k
584.47k (x0.71)
Performance/W
i9-10900KF
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
3020 points/W
5552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2781 points/W
5272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
705 points/W
1871 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
98 points/W
293 points/W
TOTAL
6604 points/W
12988 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10900KF
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
6898 points/GHz
6812 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6044 points/GHz
5535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1411 points/GHz
2386 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3025 points/GHz
3469 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
18202 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4