| | | | | | |

Core i9-10900KF vs i5-1135G7


Description
The i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 825.5 k points while the i5-1135G7 gets 238.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 3.5 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0655
806c1
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
10/20
4/8
TDP
125 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
90.37k points
68.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
825.47k points
238.87k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900KF
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
35.87k
25.96k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
31.43k
23.42k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.34k
10.1k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.73k
8.71k (x0.55)
TOTAL
90.37k
68.19k (x0.75)

Multithread

i9-10900KF

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
377.56k
94.88k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
347.59k
99.81k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
88.08k
33.6k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.24k
10.58k (x0.86)
TOTAL
825.47k
238.87k (x0.29)

Performance/W
i9-10900KF
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3020 points/W
3389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2781 points/W
3565 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
705 points/W
1200 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
98 points/W
378 points/W
TOTAL
6604 points/W
8531 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10900KF
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6898 points/GHz
6180 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6044 points/GHz
5576 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1411 points/GHz
2405 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3025 points/GHz
2075 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
16235 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4