Core i9-10900K vs Xeon W-2223
Description
The i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake architecture while the W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900K gets a score of 685.6 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 2.8 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900K gets a score of 685.6 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 2.8 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
50657
Core
Comet Lake-S
Glacier Falls
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
10/20
4/8
TDP
125 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
4x1024 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
8448 kB
Date
April 2020
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
80.41k points
59.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
685.65k points
243.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900K
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
32.67k
25.09k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
28.49k
20.76k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.53k
5.07k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.72k
8.76k (x0.69)
TOTAL
80.41k
59.68k (x0.74)
Multithread
i9-10900K
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
307.39k
111.43k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
298.47k
100.2k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.94k
24.67k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
6.89k (x1.01)
TOTAL
685.65k
243.18k (x0.35)
Performance/W
i9-10900K
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
2459 points/W
929 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
835 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
583 points/W
206 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
5485 points/W
2027 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10900K
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
6282 points/GHz
6432 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5479 points/GHz
5324 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1257 points/GHz
1301 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2445 points/GHz
2247 points/GHz
TOTAL
15463 points/GHz
15303 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4