Core i9-10900K vs Xeon E5-2697 v2
Description
The i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900K gets a score of 608.8 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 617.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 1 times faster than the i9-10900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900K gets a score of 608.8 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 617.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 1 times faster than the i9-10900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
306e4
Core
Comet Lake-S
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
10/20
12 /24
TDP
125 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
30720 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
80.41k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
685.65k points
633.14k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-10900K
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
19.5k
10.64k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
28.01k
9.53k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.45k
4.12k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.82k
3.62k (x0.23)
TOTAL
70.79k
27.91k (x0.39)
Multithread
i9-10900K
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
194.49k
252.69k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
312.59k
238.68k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.14k
115.5k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.58k
10.98k (x0.87)
TOTAL
608.81k
617.84k (x1.01)
Performance/W
i9-10900K
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1556 points/W
1944 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2501 points/W
1836 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
713 points/W
888 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
4870 points/W
4753 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10900K
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3751 points/GHz
3041 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5387 points/GHz
2722 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1433 points/GHz
1178 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3043 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
TOTAL
13614 points/GHz
7973 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4