Core i9-10900K vs Xeon E5-2680 v2
Description
The i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900K gets a score of 608.8 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 537 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2680 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900K gets a score of 608.8 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 537 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2680 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
306e4
Core
Comet Lake-S
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
10/20
10 /20
TDP
125 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
25600 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
80.41k points
28.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
685.65k points
551.1k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-10900K
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
19.5k
11.96k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
28.01k
10.73k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.45k
4.59k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.82k
4.31k (x0.27)
TOTAL
70.79k
31.6k (x0.45)
Multithread
i9-10900K
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
194.49k
218.24k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
312.59k
206.92k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.14k
100.37k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.58k
11.45k (x0.91)
TOTAL
608.81k
536.99k (x0.88)
Performance/W
i9-10900K
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1556 points/W
1898 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2501 points/W
1799 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
713 points/W
873 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
4870 points/W
4669 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10900K
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3751 points/GHz
3323 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5387 points/GHz
2982 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1433 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3043 points/GHz
1197 points/GHz
TOTAL
13614 points/GHz
8777 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4