| | | | | | |

Core i9-10900K vs i7-11800H (ES)


Description
The i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900K gets a score of 685.6 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1 times faster than the i9-10900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0655
806d0
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
10/20
8/16
TDP
125 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
80.41k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
685.65k points
709.85k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-10900K
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
19.5k
15.22k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
28.01k
25.2k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.45k
12.66k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.82k
11.66k (x0.74)
TOTAL
70.79k
64.74k (x0.91)

Multithread

i9-10900K

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
194.49k
155.37k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
312.59k
260.27k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.14k
115.37k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.58k
20.04k (x1.59)
TOTAL
608.81k
551.04k (x0.91)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900K
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
32.67k
30.84k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
28.49k
26.38k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.53k
12.66k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.72k
11.74k (x0.92)
TOTAL
80.41k
81.62k (x1.02)

Multithread

i9-10900K

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
307.39k
294.86k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
298.47k
280.92k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.94k
113.9k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
20.16k (x2.94)
TOTAL
685.65k
709.85k (x1.04)

Performance/W
i9-10900K
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
2459 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
583 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
5485 points/W
15774 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10900K
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
6282 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5479 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1257 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2445 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
15463 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4