Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 7 7700X
Description
The i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 7700X is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900K gets a score of 685.6 k points while the 7700X gets 752.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7700X is 1.1 times faster than the i9-10900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900K gets a score of 685.6 k points while the 7700X gets 752.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7700X is 1.1 times faster than the i9-10900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
a60f12
Core
Comet Lake-S
Raphael
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM5
Cores/Threads
10/20
8/16
TDP
125 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
80.41k points
115.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
685.65k points
752.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900K
7700X
Test#1 (Integers)
32.67k
38.8k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
28.49k
30.25k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.53k
15.58k (x2.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.72k
30.59k (x2.41)
TOTAL
80.41k
115.23k (x1.43)
Multithread
i9-10900K
7700X
Test#1 (Integers)
307.39k
307.13k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
298.47k
261.07k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.94k
133.91k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
50.47k (x7.37)
TOTAL
685.65k
752.57k (x1.1)
Performance/W
i9-10900K
7700X
Test#1 (Integers)
2459 points/W
2925 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
2486 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
583 points/W
1275 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
481 points/W
TOTAL
5485 points/W
7167 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10900K
7700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6282 points/GHz
7186 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5479 points/GHz
5603 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1257 points/GHz
2885 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2445 points/GHz
5665 points/GHz
TOTAL
15463 points/GHz
21338 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4