Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 5600H
Description
The i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5600H is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900K gets a score of 685.6 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 2.7 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900K gets a score of 685.6 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 2.7 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
a50f00
Core
Comet Lake-S
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
10/20
6/12
TDP
125 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
80.41k points
53.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
685.65k points
255.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900K
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
32.67k
14.34k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
28.49k
17.67k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.53k
6.41k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.72k
14.95k (x1.18)
TOTAL
80.41k
53.37k (x0.66)
Multithread
i9-10900K
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
307.39k
83.58k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
298.47k
119.22k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.94k
48.56k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
3.83k (x0.56)
TOTAL
685.65k
255.19k (x0.37)
Performance/W
i9-10900K
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
2459 points/W
1857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
2649 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
583 points/W
1079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
5485 points/W
5671 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10900K
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
6282 points/GHz
3413 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5479 points/GHz
4207 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1257 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2445 points/GHz
3560 points/GHz
TOTAL
15463 points/GHz
12707 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4