| | | | | | |

Core i9-10900K vs i7-12700H


Description
The i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-12700H is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900K gets a score of 685.6 k points while the i7-12700H gets 643.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 1.1 times faster than the i7-12700H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0655
906a3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
10/20
14/20
TDP
125 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
6x1280+6x2048 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
80.41k points
93.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
685.65k points
643.29k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-10900K
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
19.5k
24.26k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
28.01k
24.03k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.45k
14.75k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.82k
12.08k (x0.76)
TOTAL
70.79k
75.12k (x1.06)

Multithread

i9-10900K

i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
194.49k
199.99k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
312.59k
218.01k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.14k
102.62k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.58k
9.42k (x0.75)
TOTAL
608.81k
530.04k (x0.87)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900K
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
32.67k
41.64k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
28.49k
25.48k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.53k
13.2k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.72k
12.8k (x1.01)
TOTAL
80.41k
93.12k (x1.16)

Multithread

i9-10900K

i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
307.39k
276.56k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
298.47k
251.6k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.94k
104.55k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
10.58k (x1.54)
TOTAL
685.65k
643.29k (x0.94)

Performance/W
i9-10900K
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
2459 points/W
2405 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
2188 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
583 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
5485 points/W
5594 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10900K
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
6282 points/GHz
8859 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5479 points/GHz
5422 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1257 points/GHz
2808 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2445 points/GHz
2724 points/GHz
TOTAL
15463 points/GHz
19813 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4