| | | | | | |

Core i9-10900K vs i5-12400


Description
The i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900K gets a score of 685.6 k points while the i5-12400 gets 544.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 1.3 times faster than the i5-12400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0655
90672
Core
Comet Lake-S
Arder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
10/20
6/12
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
18432 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
80.41k points
102.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
685.65k points
544.64k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-10900K
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
19.5k
24.24k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
28.01k
23.92k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.45k
14.43k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.82k
14.84k (x0.94)
TOTAL
70.79k
77.43k (x1.09)

Multithread

i9-10900K

i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
194.49k
124.33k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
312.59k
168.8k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.14k
100k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.58k
21.2k (x1.68)
TOTAL
608.81k
414.33k (x0.68)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900K
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
32.67k
48.08k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
28.49k
25.6k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.53k
14.02k (x2.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.72k
14.81k (x1.16)
TOTAL
80.41k
102.51k (x1.27)

Multithread

i9-10900K

i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
307.39k
230.14k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
298.47k
198.07k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.94k
94.78k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
21.64k (x3.16)
TOTAL
685.65k
544.64k (x0.79)

Performance/W
i9-10900K
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
2459 points/W
3541 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
3047 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
583 points/W
1458 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
5485 points/W
8379 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10900K
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
6282 points/GHz
10927 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5479 points/GHz
5819 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1257 points/GHz
3186 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2445 points/GHz
3365 points/GHz
TOTAL
15463 points/GHz
23298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4