| | | | | | |

Core i9-10900K vs i7-1165G7


Description
The i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900K gets a score of 685.6 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 3.3 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0655
806c1
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake-UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
10/20
4/8
TDP
125 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
80.41k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
685.65k points
210.4k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-10900K
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
19.5k
14.48k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
28.01k
24.18k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.45k
11.95k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.82k
11.01k (x0.7)
TOTAL
70.79k
61.62k (x0.87)

Multithread

i9-10900K

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
194.49k
50.98k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
312.59k
80.7k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.14k
36.61k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.58k
12.02k (x0.96)
TOTAL
608.81k
180.32k (x0.3)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900K
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
32.67k
22.97k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
28.49k
21.61k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.53k
8.99k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.72k
8.52k (x0.67)
TOTAL
80.41k
62.1k (x0.77)

Multithread

i9-10900K

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
307.39k
82.75k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
298.47k
86.58k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.94k
29.34k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
11.72k (x1.71)
TOTAL
685.65k
210.4k (x0.31)

Performance/W
i9-10900K
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2459 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
583 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
5485 points/W
7514 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10900K
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6282 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5479 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1257 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2445 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
15463 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4