Core i7-640LM vs i5-1035G4
Description
The i7-640LM is based on Westmere architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-640LM gets a score of 31.7 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 87.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 2.8 times faster than the i7-640LM. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-640LM gets a score of 31.7 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 87.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 2.8 times faster than the i7-640LM. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
706e5
Core
Calpella
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.667 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1288
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
25 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2010
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
16.35k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.74k points
142.69k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-640LM
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
7.01k
7.07k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
4.58k
10.55k (x2.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.73k
5.27k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.03k
5.66k (x2.79)
TOTAL
16.35k
28.56k (x1.75)
Multithread
i7-640LM
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
12.93k
25.28k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
10.21k
37.48k (x3.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
17.77k (x2.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.37k
6.92k (x2.92)
TOTAL
31.74k
87.45k (x2.76)
Performance/W
i7-640LM
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
517 points/W
1685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
409 points/W
2499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
249 points/W
1185 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
95 points/W
461 points/W
TOTAL
1269 points/W
5830 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-640LM
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2627 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1024 points/GHz
1424 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
762 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
6130 points/GHz
7718 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4