Core i7-950 vs Celeron N5100
Description
The i7-950 is based on Westmere architecture while the N5100 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-950 gets a score of 76.3 k points while the N5100 gets 89.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-950 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-950 gets a score of 76.3 k points while the N5100 gets 89.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-950 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
906c0
Core
Bloomfield
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
3.066 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.333 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
130 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2009
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
19.46k points
26.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
76.29k points
89.82k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-950
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
8.01k
9.74k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
5.38k
9.84k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
3.89k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
3.51k (x1.19)
TOTAL
19.46k
26.98k (x1.39)
Multithread
i7-950
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
31.53k
34.19k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
24.16k
36.28k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.84k
15.3k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.75k
4.05k (x0.85)
TOTAL
76.29k
89.82k (x1.18)
Performance/W
i7-950
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
243 points/W
5699 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
186 points/W
6047 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122 points/W
2550 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
674 points/W
TOTAL
587 points/W
14970 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-950
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
2403 points/GHz
3479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1614 points/GHz
3514 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
934 points/GHz
1389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
888 points/GHz
1255 points/GHz
TOTAL
5839 points/GHz
9637 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4