| | | |

Core i7-930 vs Pentium G4560


Description
The i7-930 is based on Westmere architecture while the G4560 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-930 gets a score of 69.4 k points while the G4560 gets 89.9 k points.

Summarizing, the G4560 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-930 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
906e9
Core
Bloomfield
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.067 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
130 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
February 2010
January 2017

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-930
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
7276
13012 (78.84%)
Test#2 (FP)
4819
18744 (288.95%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2862
5056 (76.66%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2623
7399 (182.07%)
TOTAL
17580
44211 (151.48%)

Multithread

i7-930

G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
28092
27218 (-3.11%)
Test#2 (FP)
21624
43794 (102.52%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14826
11741 (-20.81%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4851
7157 (47.56%)
TOTAL
69393
89911 (29.57%)

Performance/W
i7-930
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
216 points/W
504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
166 points/W
811 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
133 points/W
TOTAL
534 points/W
1665 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-930
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
2372 points/GHz
3718 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1571 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
933 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
855 points/GHz
2114 points/GHz
TOTAL
5732 points/GHz
12632 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8