Core i7-930 vs Celeron N5100
Description
The i7-930 is based on Westmere architecture while the N5100 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-930 gets a score of 69.4 k points while the N5100 gets 89.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-930 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-930 gets a score of 69.4 k points while the N5100 gets 89.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-930 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
906c0
Core
Bloomfield
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.067 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
130 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2010
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
17.58k points
26.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
69.39k points
89.82k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-930
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
7.28k
9.74k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
4.82k
9.84k (x2.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.86k
3.89k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.62k
3.51k (x1.34)
TOTAL
17.58k
26.98k (x1.53)
Multithread
i7-930
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
28.09k
34.19k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
21.62k
36.28k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.83k
15.3k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
4.05k (x0.83)
TOTAL
69.39k
89.82k (x1.29)
Performance/W
i7-930
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
216 points/W
5699 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
166 points/W
6047 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114 points/W
2550 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
674 points/W
TOTAL
534 points/W
14970 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-930
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
2372 points/GHz
3479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1571 points/GHz
3514 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
933 points/GHz
1389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
855 points/GHz
1255 points/GHz
TOTAL
5732 points/GHz
9637 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4