| | | | | | |

Core i7-920 vs Xeon X3430


Description
The i7-920 is based on Nehalem Westmere architecture while the X3430 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-920 gets a score of 47.2 k points while the X3430 gets 55.7 k points.

Summarizing, the X3430 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-920 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
106e5
Core
Bloomfield
Lynnfield
Architecture
Nehalem Westmere
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.993 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA1156
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
130 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
November 2008
October 2009
Mean monothread perf.
16.33k points
15.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.2k points
55.66k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-920
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
1.97k
1.75k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
4.43k
3.95k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
2.29k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
2.66k (x1.05)
TOTAL
11.68k
10.65k (x0.91)

Multithread

i7-920

X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
7.71k
6.81k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
18.81k
15.37k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.76k
8.9k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
4.42k (x0.87)
TOTAL
45.34k
35.49k (x0.78)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-920
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
6.12k
6.41k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
4.76k
4.27k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.78k
2.38k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
2.67k (x1)
TOTAL
16.33k
15.74k (x0.96)

Multithread

i7-920

X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
19.26k
25.19k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
14.96k
16.76k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.05k
9.33k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.92k
4.37k (x0.89)
TOTAL
47.2k
55.66k (x1.18)

Performance/W
i7-920
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
148 points/W
265 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
115 points/W
176 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
62 points/W
98 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
38 points/W
46 points/W
TOTAL
363 points/W
586 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-920
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
2044 points/GHz
2288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1591 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/GHz
852 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
891 points/GHz
954 points/GHz
TOTAL
5457 points/GHz
5621 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4