| | | | | | |

Core i7-920 vs Pentium Gold 5405U


Description
The i7-920 is based on Nehalem Westmere architecture while the 5405U is based on Whiskey Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-920 gets a score of 47.2 k points while the 5405U gets 48.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 5405U is 1 times faster than the i7-920 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
806eb
Core
Bloomfield
Whiskey Lake-U
Architecture
Nehalem Westmere
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.993 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
130 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2048 kB
Date
November 2008
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
16.33k points
21.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.2k points
48.83k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-920
5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.12k
7.01k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
4.76k
9.51k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.78k
2.31k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
2.52k (x0.94)
TOTAL
16.33k
21.34k (x1.31)

Multithread

i7-920

5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.26k
16.03k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
14.96k
24.11k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.05k
5.59k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.92k
3.1k (x0.63)
TOTAL
47.2k
48.83k (x1.03)

Performance/W
i7-920
5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
148 points/W
1069 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
115 points/W
1607 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
62 points/W
372 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
38 points/W
207 points/W
TOTAL
363 points/W
3255 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-920
5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
2044 points/GHz
3046 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1591 points/GHz
4134 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/GHz
1004 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
891 points/GHz
1094 points/GHz
TOTAL
5457 points/GHz
9278 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4