Core i7-920 vs Celeron N5105
Description
The i7-920 is based on Nehalem Westmere architecture while the N5105 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-920 gets a score of 47.2 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-920 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-920 gets a score of 47.2 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-920 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
906c0
Core
Bloomfield
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.993 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
130 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2008
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
16.33k points
27.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.2k points
64.09k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-920
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
6.12k
9.83k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
4.76k
9.74k (x2.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.78k
3.65k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
3.88k (x1.45)
TOTAL
16.33k
27.1k (x1.66)
Multithread
i7-920
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
19.26k
25.04k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
14.96k
24.7k (x1.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.05k
9.29k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.92k
5.06k (x1.03)
TOTAL
47.2k
64.09k (x1.36)
Performance/W
i7-920
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
148 points/W
2504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
115 points/W
2470 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
62 points/W
929 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
38 points/W
506 points/W
TOTAL
363 points/W
6409 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-920
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
2044 points/GHz
3388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1591 points/GHz
3358 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
891 points/GHz
1338 points/GHz
TOTAL
5457 points/GHz
9344 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4