Core i7-870 vs Celeron J3455
Description
The i7-870 is based on Nehalem architecture while the J3455 is based on Goldmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-870 gets a score of 42.5 k points while the J3455 gets 47.3 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-870 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-870 gets a score of 42.5 k points while the J3455 gets 47.3 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-870 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106e5
506c9
Core
Lynnfield
Apollo Lake
Base frecuency
2.933 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1156
BGA1296
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
95 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2009
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
15.44k points
12.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
42.53k points
47.34k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-870
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
5.86k
6.02k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
4.53k
3.49k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.36k
2.01k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.69k
1.47k (x0.54)
TOTAL
15.44k
12.98k (x0.84)
Multithread
i7-870
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
17.53k
23.7k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
13.65k
13.75k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.93k
7.8k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.41k
2.09k (x0.61)
TOTAL
42.53k
47.34k (x1.11)
Performance/W
i7-870
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
185 points/W
2370 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
144 points/W
1375 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83 points/W
780 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
36 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
448 points/W
4734 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-870
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
1629 points/GHz
2619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1257 points/GHz
1517 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
655 points/GHz
872 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
748 points/GHz
637 points/GHz
TOTAL
4289 points/GHz
5645 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4