| | | | | | |

Core i7-860 vs Xeon E5-2670 v3


Description
The i7-860 is based on Nehalem architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-860 gets a score of 70.7 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 325.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 4.6 times faster than the i7-860 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106e5
306f2
Core
Lynnfield
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1156
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
95 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
30720 kB
Date
September 2009
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
19.07k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
70.68k points
452.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-860
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2.15k
3.52k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
4.87k
8.68k (x1.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.82k
2.83k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
3.13k (x1)
TOTAL
12.97k
18.17k (x1.4)

Multithread

i7-860

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
8.24k
32.7k (x3.97)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
105.18k (x4.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.65k
35.18k (x2.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.02k
9.54k (x1.9)
TOTAL
49.54k
182.59k (x3.69)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-860
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
7.83k
11.08k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
5.23k
9.57k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.91k
3.18k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
3.28k (x1.06)
TOTAL
19.07k
27.11k (x1.42)

Multithread

i7-860

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
29.29k
139.07k (x4.75)
Test#2 (FP)
22.75k
133.47k (x5.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.04k
46.6k (x3.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.6k
6.65k (x1.45)
TOTAL
70.68k
325.78k (x4.61)

Performance/W
i7-860
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
308 points/W
1159 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
240 points/W
1112 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
148 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
744 points/W
2715 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-860
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2259 points/GHz
3573 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1509 points/GHz
3087 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
839 points/GHz
1027 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
892 points/GHz
1059 points/GHz
TOTAL
5500 points/GHz
8745 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4