| | | | | | |

Core i7-860 vs Xeon E3-1225


Description
The i7-860 is based on Nehalem architecture while the E3-1225 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-860 gets a score of 70.7 k points while the E3-1225 gets 69 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-860 is 1 times faster than the E3-1225. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106e5
206a7
Core
Lynnfield
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1156
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
95 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2009
April 2011
Mean monothread perf.
19.07k points
23.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
70.68k points
68.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-860
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
2.15k
2.63k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
4.87k
7.2k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.82k
3.71k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
2.55k (x0.82)
TOTAL
12.97k
16.08k (x1.24)

Multithread

i7-860

E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
8.24k
8.23k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
22.82k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.65k
11.68k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.02k
2.12k (x0.42)
TOTAL
49.54k
44.85k (x0.91)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-860
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
7.83k
9.65k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
5.23k
7.76k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.91k
3.95k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
2.57k (x0.83)
TOTAL
19.07k
23.94k (x1.26)

Multithread

i7-860

E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
29.29k
30.52k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
22.75k
24.1k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.04k
12.01k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.6k
2.34k (x0.51)
TOTAL
70.68k
68.97k (x0.98)

Performance/W
i7-860
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
308 points/W
321 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
240 points/W
254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
148 points/W
126 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
25 points/W
TOTAL
744 points/W
726 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-860
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
2259 points/GHz
2839 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1509 points/GHz
2283 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
839 points/GHz
1162 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
892 points/GHz
757 points/GHz
TOTAL
5500 points/GHz
7041 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4