Core i7-860 vs i7-8750H
Description
The i7-860 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i7-8750H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-860 gets a score of 49.5 k points while the i7-8750H gets 52.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8750H is 1.1 times faster than the i7-860 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-860 gets a score of 49.5 k points while the i7-8750H gets 52.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8750H is 1.1 times faster than the i7-860 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106e5
906ea
Core
Lynnfield
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1156
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
9216 kB
Date
September 2009
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
19.07k points
53.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
70.68k points
231.9k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-860
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2.15k
3.01k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
4.87k
11.68k (x2.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.82k
3.78k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
5.64k (x1.81)
TOTAL
12.97k
24.12k (x1.86)
Multithread
i7-860
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
8.24k
7.4k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
29.99k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.65k
9.66k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.02k
5.12k (x1.02)
TOTAL
49.54k
52.18k (x1.05)
Performance/W
i7-860
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
87 points/W
165 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
228 points/W
667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
154 points/W
215 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
114 points/W
TOTAL
521 points/W
1160 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-860
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
620 points/GHz
734 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1405 points/GHz
2850 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
814 points/GHz
922 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
902 points/GHz
1377 points/GHz
TOTAL
3741 points/GHz
5883 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4