| | | | | | |

Core i7-860 vs i5-1035G4


Description
The i7-860 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-860 gets a score of 70.7 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 87.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-860 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106e5
706e5
Core
Lynnfield
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1156
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2009
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
19.07k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
70.68k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-860
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2.15k
4.05k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
4.87k
15.29k (x3.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.82k
9.04k (x3.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.13k
10.54k (x3.37)
TOTAL
12.97k
38.92k (x3)

Multithread

i7-860

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
8.24k
9.05k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
33.88k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.65k
15.34k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.02k
6.74k (x1.34)
TOTAL
49.54k
65.01k (x1.31)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-860
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
7.83k
7.07k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
5.23k
10.55k (x2.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.91k
5.27k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
5.66k (x1.83)
TOTAL
19.07k
28.56k (x1.5)

Multithread

i7-860

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
29.29k
25.28k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
22.75k
37.48k (x1.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.04k
17.77k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.6k
6.92k (x1.5)
TOTAL
70.68k
87.45k (x1.24)

Performance/W
i7-860
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
308 points/W
1685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
240 points/W
2499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
148 points/W
1185 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
461 points/W
TOTAL
744 points/W
5830 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-860
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2259 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1509 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
839 points/GHz
1424 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
892 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
5500 points/GHz
7718 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4