Core i7-860 vs Celeron N5100
Description
The i7-860 is based on Nehalem architecture while the N5100 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-860 gets a score of 70.7 k points while the N5100 gets 89.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-860 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-860 gets a score of 70.7 k points while the N5100 gets 89.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-860 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106e5
906c0
Core
Lynnfield
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1156
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
95 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2009
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
19.07k points
26.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
70.68k points
89.82k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-860
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
7.83k
9.74k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
5.23k
9.84k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.91k
3.89k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
3.51k (x1.14)
TOTAL
19.07k
26.98k (x1.42)
Multithread
i7-860
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
29.29k
34.19k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
22.75k
36.28k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.04k
15.3k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.6k
4.05k (x0.88)
TOTAL
70.68k
89.82k (x1.27)
Performance/W
i7-860
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
308 points/W
5699 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
240 points/W
6047 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
148 points/W
2550 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
674 points/W
TOTAL
744 points/W
14970 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-860
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
2259 points/GHz
3479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1509 points/GHz
3514 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
839 points/GHz
1389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
892 points/GHz
1255 points/GHz
TOTAL
5500 points/GHz
9637 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4