Core i7-9850H vs Ryzen 3 3250U
Description
The i7-9850H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3250U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9850H gets a score of 289.3 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9850H is 3.7 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9850H gets a score of 289.3 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9850H is 3.7 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
810f81
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Dali
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2019
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
49.24k points
33.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
289.3k points
77.88k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9850H
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.83k
9.33k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
16.52k
17.1k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
3.57k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.02k
3.26k (x0.36)
TOTAL
49.24k
33.26k (x0.68)
Multithread
i7-9850H
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
130.19k
22.14k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
121.44k
40.04k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.05k
10.71k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.62k
5k (x0.52)
TOTAL
289.3k
77.88k (x0.27)
Performance/W
i7-9850H
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
2893 points/W
1476 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2699 points/W
2669 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
6429 points/W
5192 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9850H
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
4311 points/GHz
2667 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3591 points/GHz
4886 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
841 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1961 points/GHz
932 points/GHz
TOTAL
10703 points/GHz
9503 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4