| | | | | | |

Core i7-9750H vs Xeon E5-2690 v3


Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E5-2690 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 276.5 k points while the E5-2690 v3 gets 1016.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2690 v3 is 3.7 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
306f2
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/24
TDP
45 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
30720 kB
Date
April 2019
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
62.92k points
40.71k points
Mean multithread perf.
276.46k points
1016.36k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
25.22k
20.96k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
21.97k
11.74k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
4.61k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.71k
3.4k (x0.32)
TOTAL
62.92k
40.71k (x0.65)

Multithread

i7-9750H

E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
125.56k
531.68k (x4.23)
Test#2 (FP)
115.86k
342.28k (x2.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.63k
133.22k (x5.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
9.19k (x0.98)
TOTAL
276.46k
1016.36k (x3.68)

Performance/W
i7-9750H
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2790 points/W
3938 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2575 points/W
2535 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
570 points/W
987 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
6144 points/W
7529 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5605 points/GHz
5988 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4882 points/GHz
3356 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1115 points/GHz
1318 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2380 points/GHz
971 points/GHz
TOTAL
13982 points/GHz
11632 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4