Core i7-9750H vs Xeon E5-1620 v2
Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E5-1620 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 258.9 k points while the E5-1620 v2 gets 144.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.8 times faster than the E5-1620 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 258.9 k points while the E5-1620 v2 gets 144.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.8 times faster than the E5-1620 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
306e4
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
6/12
4 /8
TDP
45 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
10240 kB
Date
April 2019
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
62.92k points
34.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
276.46k points
144.57k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-9750H
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
16.31k
12.55k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
24.48k
12.14k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
4.83k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.02k
4.85k (x0.37)
TOTAL
59.67k
34.37k (x0.58)
Multithread
i7-9750H
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
87.54k
51.93k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
131.05k
56.7k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.47k
23.81k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.8k
12.14k (x1.03)
TOTAL
258.87k
144.57k (x0.56)
Performance/W
i7-9750H
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1945 points/W
399 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2912 points/W
436 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
633 points/W
183 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
262 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
5753 points/W
1112 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3624 points/GHz
3217 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5439 points/GHz
3113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1304 points/GHz
1238 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2894 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
TOTAL
13261 points/GHz
8812 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4