| | | | | | |

Core i7-9750H vs i5-5675R


Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-5675R is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 276.5 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.4 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
40671
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Bradwell-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
June 2015
Mean monothread perf.
62.92k points
51.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
276.46k points
194.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9750H
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
4.53k
4.14k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
18.24k
14.35k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.76k
4.94k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.01k
5.47k (x0.42)
TOTAL
41.54k
28.91k (x0.7)

Multithread

i7-9750H

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
24.3k
16.02k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
97.88k
54.6k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.85k
18.69k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.93k
16.87k (x1.41)
TOTAL
163.95k
106.18k (x0.65)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-9750H
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
16.32k
12.86k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
23.42k
16.85k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.04k
5.19k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.24k
5.49k (x0.41)
TOTAL
59.03k
40.39k (x0.68)

Multithread

i7-9750H

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
86.92k
50.07k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
126.14k
64.61k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.62k
19.84k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.86k
17.09k (x1.44)
TOTAL
254.54k
151.6k (x0.6)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-9750H
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
16.31k
12.88k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
24.48k
18.27k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
5.12k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.02k
5.45k (x0.42)
TOTAL
59.67k
41.72k (x0.7)

Multithread

i7-9750H

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
87.54k
49.91k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
131.05k
70.3k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.47k
19.69k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.8k
16.92k (x1.43)
TOTAL
258.87k
156.83k (x0.61)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
25.22k
21.91k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
21.97k
18.59k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
5.2k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.71k
5.72k (x0.53)
TOTAL
62.92k
51.43k (x0.82)

Multithread

i7-9750H

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
125.56k
84.92k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
115.86k
72.09k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.63k
20.13k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
17.07k (x1.82)
TOTAL
276.46k
194.2k (x0.7)

Performance/W
i7-9750H
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
2790 points/W
1306 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2575 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
570 points/W
310 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
6144 points/W
2988 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
5605 points/GHz
6087 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4882 points/GHz
5164 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1115 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2380 points/GHz
1590 points/GHz
TOTAL
13982 points/GHz
14286 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4