| | | | | | |

Core i7-9750H vs i5-1035G4


Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 276.5 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.9 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
706e5
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
62.92k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
276.46k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9750H
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.53k
4.05k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
18.24k
15.29k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.76k
9.04k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.01k
10.54k (x0.81)
TOTAL
41.54k
38.92k (x0.94)

Multithread

i7-9750H

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
24.3k
9.05k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
97.88k
33.88k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.85k
15.34k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.93k
6.74k (x0.56)
TOTAL
163.95k
65.01k (x0.4)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-9750H
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
16.32k
7.07k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
23.42k
10.55k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.04k
5.27k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.24k
5.66k (x0.43)
TOTAL
59.03k
28.56k (x0.48)

Multithread

i7-9750H

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
86.92k
25.28k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
126.14k
37.48k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.62k
17.77k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.86k
6.92k (x0.58)
TOTAL
254.54k
87.45k (x0.34)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-9750H
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
16.31k
13.9k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
24.48k
20.13k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
9.41k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.02k
10.59k (x0.81)
TOTAL
59.67k
54.03k (x0.91)

Multithread

i7-9750H

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
87.54k
55.4k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
131.05k
59.01k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.47k
22.83k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.8k
6.7k (x0.57)
TOTAL
258.87k
143.94k (x0.56)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
25.22k
25.53k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
21.97k
19.99k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
9.31k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.71k
10.81k (x1.01)
TOTAL
62.92k
65.64k (x1.04)

Multithread

i7-9750H

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
125.56k
58.46k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
115.86k
57.31k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.63k
20.1k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
6.81k (x0.72)
TOTAL
276.46k
142.69k (x0.52)

Performance/W
i7-9750H
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2790 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2575 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
570 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
6144 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
5605 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4882 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1115 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2380 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
13982 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4