| | | | | | |

Core i7-9750H vs Ryzen 7 2700X


Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 276.5 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.6 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
800f82
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
62.92k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
276.46k points
431.14k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9750H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.53k
4.25k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
18.24k
19.72k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.76k
5.84k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.01k
21.36k (x1.64)
TOTAL
41.54k
51.17k (x1.23)

Multithread

i7-9750H

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
24.3k
35.04k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
97.88k
181.42k (x1.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.85k
64.86k (x2.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.93k
8.21k (x0.69)
TOTAL
163.95k
289.54k (x1.77)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-9750H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.32k
15.22k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
23.42k
24.12k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.04k
5.87k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.24k
21k (x1.59)
TOTAL
59.03k
66.21k (x1.12)

Multithread

i7-9750H

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
86.92k
126.81k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
126.14k
229.86k (x1.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.62k
61.74k (x2.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.86k
9.77k (x0.82)
TOTAL
254.54k
428.19k (x1.68)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-9750H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.31k
14.44k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
24.48k
24.92k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
5.8k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.02k
19.07k (x1.46)
TOTAL
59.67k
64.24k (x1.08)

Multithread

i7-9750H

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
87.54k
122.01k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
131.05k
220.34k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.47k
59.89k (x2.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.8k
9.9k (x0.84)
TOTAL
258.87k
412.13k (x1.59)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
25.22k
15.34k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
21.97k
25.75k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
5.79k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.71k
17.95k (x1.68)
TOTAL
62.92k
64.83k (x1.03)

Multithread

i7-9750H

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
125.56k
123.07k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
115.86k
239.3k (x2.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.63k
60.6k (x2.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
8.18k (x0.87)
TOTAL
276.46k
431.14k (x1.56)

Performance/W
i7-9750H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
2790 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2575 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
570 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
6144 points/W
4106 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
5605 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4882 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1115 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2380 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
13982 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4