| | | | | | |

Core i7-9750H vs Ryzen 7 1700X


Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 1700X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 276.5 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700X is 1.3 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
800f11
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2019
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
62.92k points
56.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
276.46k points
372.73k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-9750H
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.31k
12.5k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
24.48k
22.92k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
5.45k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.02k
14.72k (x1.13)
TOTAL
59.67k
55.59k (x0.93)

Multithread

i7-9750H

1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
87.54k
92.51k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
131.05k
144.76k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.47k
54.43k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.8k
22.08k (x1.87)
TOTAL
258.87k
313.78k (x1.21)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
25.22k
13.72k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
21.97k
22.48k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
5.12k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.71k
15.44k (x1.44)
TOTAL
62.92k
56.76k (x0.9)

Multithread

i7-9750H

1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
125.56k
110.92k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
115.86k
200.56k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.63k
54.24k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
7.01k (x0.75)
TOTAL
276.46k
372.73k (x1.35)

Performance/W
i7-9750H
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
2790 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2575 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
570 points/W
571 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
6144 points/W
3923 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
5605 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4882 points/GHz
5916 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1115 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2380 points/GHz
4063 points/GHz
TOTAL
13982 points/GHz
14938 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4