Core i7-9750H vs Ryzen 5 5625U
Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 5625U is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 276.5 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5625U is 1 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 276.5 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5625U is 1 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
a50f00
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Barcelo
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
62.92k points
70.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
276.46k points
281.26k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.22k
18.57k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
21.97k
22.03k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
9.55k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.71k
20.5k (x1.91)
TOTAL
62.92k
70.65k (x1.12)
Multithread
i7-9750H
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
125.56k
92.92k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
115.86k
128.4k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.63k
54.82k (x2.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
5.13k (x0.55)
TOTAL
276.46k
281.26k (x1.02)
Performance/W
i7-9750H
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
2790 points/W
6194 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2575 points/W
8560 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
570 points/W
3654 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
342 points/W
TOTAL
6144 points/W
18750 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
5605 points/GHz
4318 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4882 points/GHz
5124 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1115 points/GHz
2221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2380 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
TOTAL
13982 points/GHz
16431 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4