| | | | | | |

Core i7-9750H vs Ryzen 5 3600


Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 276.5 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
870f10
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
62.92k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
276.46k points
348.35k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9750H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.53k
4.2k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
18.24k
17.36k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.76k
7.5k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.01k
23.79k (x1.83)
TOTAL
41.54k
52.85k (x1.27)

Multithread

i7-9750H

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
24.3k
22.11k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
97.88k
108.04k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.85k
56.81k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.93k
36.39k (x3.05)
TOTAL
163.95k
223.36k (x1.36)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-9750H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
16.32k
15.38k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
23.42k
21.94k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.04k
7.97k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.24k
24.76k (x1.87)
TOTAL
59.03k
70.05k (x1.19)

Multithread

i7-9750H

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
86.92k
96.91k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
126.14k
135.12k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.62k
70.39k (x2.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.86k
56.43k (x4.76)
TOTAL
254.54k
358.85k (x1.41)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-9750H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
16.31k
15.04k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
24.48k
20.95k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
8.57k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.02k
21.71k (x1.67)
TOTAL
59.67k
66.27k (x1.11)

Multithread

i7-9750H

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
87.54k
94.36k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
131.05k
141.73k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.47k
69.38k (x2.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.8k
32.72k (x2.77)
TOTAL
258.87k
338.19k (x1.31)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
25.22k
16.04k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
21.97k
24.47k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
8.38k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.71k
21.66k (x2.02)
TOTAL
62.92k
70.55k (x1.12)

Multithread

i7-9750H

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
125.56k
113.63k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
115.86k
143.55k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.63k
63.84k (x2.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
27.34k (x2.91)
TOTAL
276.46k
348.35k (x1.26)

Performance/W
i7-9750H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
2790 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2575 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
570 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
6144 points/W
5359 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
5605 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4882 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1115 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2380 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
13982 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4