Core i7-9750H vs Ryzen 5 2600X
Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 276.5 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.2 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 276.5 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.2 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
800f82
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
62.92k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
276.46k points
333.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
25.22k
15.75k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
21.97k
26.29k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
5.91k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.71k
18.48k (x1.73)
TOTAL
62.92k
66.44k (x1.06)
Multithread
i7-9750H
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
125.56k
94.49k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
115.86k
182.53k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.63k
45.95k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
10.15k (x1.08)
TOTAL
276.46k
333.12k (x1.2)
Performance/W
i7-9750H
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
2790 points/W
995 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2575 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
570 points/W
484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
6144 points/W
3507 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
5605 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4882 points/GHz
6261 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1115 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2380 points/GHz
4401 points/GHz
TOTAL
13982 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4