| | | | | | |

Core i7-9750H vs i3-1115G4


Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 276.5 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 2 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
806c1
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
45 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
62.92k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
276.46k points
137.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9750H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.53k
3.75k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
18.24k
17.22k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.76k
9.79k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.01k
8.21k (x0.63)
TOTAL
41.54k
38.97k (x0.94)

Multithread

i7-9750H

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
24.3k
9.19k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
97.88k
35.47k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.85k
19.14k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.93k
5.82k (x0.49)
TOTAL
163.95k
69.62k (x0.42)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-9750H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
16.32k
12.9k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
23.42k
21.4k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.04k
10.73k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.24k
8.16k (x0.62)
TOTAL
59.03k
53.19k (x0.9)

Multithread

i7-9750H

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
86.92k
30.31k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
126.14k
45.13k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.62k
20.17k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.86k
5.77k (x0.49)
TOTAL
254.54k
101.38k (x0.4)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-9750H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
16.31k
14.65k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
24.48k
21.57k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
9.93k (x1.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.02k
8.02k (x0.62)
TOTAL
59.67k
54.18k (x0.91)

Multithread

i7-9750H

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
87.54k
32.14k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
131.05k
43.54k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.47k
19.58k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.8k
5.61k (x0.48)
TOTAL
258.87k
100.87k (x0.39)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
25.22k
24.25k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
21.97k
21.63k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
9.09k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.71k
7.23k (x0.68)
TOTAL
62.92k
62.19k (x0.99)

Multithread

i7-9750H

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
125.56k
56.9k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
115.86k
55.68k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.63k
19.29k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
6.09k (x0.65)
TOTAL
276.46k
137.96k (x0.5)

Performance/W
i7-9750H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2790 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2575 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
570 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
6144 points/W
4927 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
5605 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4882 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1115 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2380 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
13982 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4