Core i7-9750H vs Ryzen 7 5800U
Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 5800U is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 286.4 k points while the 5800U gets 314.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800U is 1.1 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 286.4 k points while the 5800U gets 314.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800U is 1.1 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
a50f00
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
65.33k points
71.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
286.43k points
314.55k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.93k
18.34k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
22.84k
22.78k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
9.45k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.46k
20.59k (x1.8)
TOTAL
65.33k
71.16k (x1.09)
Multithread
i7-9750H
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
130.68k
102.74k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
119.91k
143.27k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.76k
58.13k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.08k
10.41k (x1.47)
TOTAL
286.43k
314.55k (x1.1)
Performance/W
i7-9750H
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
2904 points/W
6849 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2665 points/W
9551 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
639 points/W
3875 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
157 points/W
694 points/W
TOTAL
6365 points/W
20970 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
5762 points/GHz
4168 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5075 points/GHz
5178 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1135 points/GHz
2147 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2547 points/GHz
4679 points/GHz
TOTAL
14519 points/GHz
16172 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4