Core i7-9750H vs Ryzen 7 3800X
Description
The i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3800X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 286.4 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.7 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9750H gets a score of 286.4 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.7 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
870f10
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
65.33k points
75.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
286.43k points
497.74k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9750H
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
25.93k
17.1k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
22.84k
26.59k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
8.91k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.46k
23.21k (x2.02)
TOTAL
65.33k
75.81k (x1.16)
Multithread
i7-9750H
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
130.68k
172.04k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
119.91k
214.03k (x1.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.76k
97.1k (x3.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.08k
14.57k (x2.06)
TOTAL
286.43k
497.74k (x1.74)
Performance/W
i7-9750H
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
2904 points/W
1638 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2665 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
639 points/W
925 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
157 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
6365 points/W
4740 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9750H
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
5762 points/GHz
3799 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5075 points/GHz
5909 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1135 points/GHz
1981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2547 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
14519 points/GHz
16847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4