Core i7-9700F vs Xeon X5670
Description
The i7-9700F is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the X5670 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700F gets a score of 269.9 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9700F is 2.3 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700F gets a score of 269.9 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9700F is 2.3 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
206c2
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.933 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
8/8
6 /6
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2019
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
60.93k points
20.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
269.85k points
115.4k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-9700F
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
16.8k
8.35k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
24.08k
5.58k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
3.32k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.98k
3k (x0.21)
TOTAL
60.93k
20.26k (x0.33)
Multithread
i7-9700F
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
92.79k
49.72k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
135.13k
35.19k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.29k
21.88k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.64k
8.6k (x1)
TOTAL
269.85k
115.4k (x0.43)
Performance/W
i7-9700F
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
1428 points/W
523 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2079 points/W
370 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
512 points/W
230 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
133 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
4152 points/W
1215 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9700F
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
3575 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5124 points/GHz
1675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1290 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2975 points/GHz
900 points/GHz
TOTAL
12964 points/GHz
6078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4