Core i7-9700F vs Ryzen 7 5700X
Description
The i7-9700F is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 5700X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700F gets a score of 164.3 k points while the 5700X gets 304.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700X is 1.9 times faster than the i7-9700F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700F gets a score of 164.3 k points while the 5700X gets 304.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700X is 1.9 times faster than the i7-9700F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
a20f12
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Vermeer
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
60.93k points
85.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
269.85k points
517.51k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9700F
5700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.67k
4.82k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
17.16k
19.73k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.7k
11.69k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
27.52k (x1.91)
TOTAL
41.9k
63.75k (x1.52)
Multithread
i7-9700F
5700X
Test#1 (Integers)
26.31k
32.8k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
97.53k
161.17k (x1.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.53k
98k (x3.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.94k
12.92k (x1.44)
TOTAL
164.31k
304.88k (x1.86)
Performance/W
i7-9700F
5700X
Test#1 (Integers)
405 points/W
505 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1500 points/W
2479 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
485 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
138 points/W
199 points/W
TOTAL
2528 points/W
4690 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9700F
5700X
Test#1 (Integers)
994 points/GHz
1047 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3652 points/GHz
4288 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1212 points/GHz
2542 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3057 points/GHz
5982 points/GHz
TOTAL
8915 points/GHz
13859 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4