| | | | | | |

Core i7-9700F vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The i7-9700F is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700F gets a score of 269.9 k points while the 2400G gets 183 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9700F is 1.5 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
810f10
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
60.93k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
269.85k points
198.27k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9700F
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.67k
3.8k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
17.16k
17.38k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.7k
5.17k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
3.16k (x0.22)
TOTAL
41.9k
29.52k (x0.7)

Multithread

i7-9700F

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
26.31k
15.28k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
97.53k
76.44k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.53k
27.48k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.94k
3.02k (x0.34)
TOTAL
164.31k
122.2k (x0.74)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-9700F
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
16.8k
13.95k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
24.08k
20.7k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
5.33k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.98k
3.03k (x0.22)
TOTAL
60.93k
43.01k (x0.71)

Multithread

i7-9700F

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
92.79k
58.56k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
135.13k
92.95k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.29k
28.55k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.64k
2.98k (x0.34)
TOTAL
269.85k
183.04k (x0.68)

Performance/W
i7-9700F
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1428 points/W
901 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2079 points/W
1430 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
512 points/W
439 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
133 points/W
46 points/W
TOTAL
4152 points/W
2816 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9700F
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3575 points/GHz
3577 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5124 points/GHz
5308 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1290 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2975 points/GHz
776 points/GHz
TOTAL
12964 points/GHz
11028 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4