| | | | | | |

Core i7-9700F vs i5-12400F


Description
The i7-9700F is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700F gets a score of 269.9 k points while the i5-12400F gets 404.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.5 times faster than the i7-9700F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
90675
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
18432 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
60.93k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
269.85k points
399.39k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9700F
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.67k
7.43k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
17.16k
18.64k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.7k
13.15k (x2.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
14.82k (x1.03)
TOTAL
41.9k
54.04k (x1.29)

Multithread

i7-9700F

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
26.31k
36.23k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
97.53k
134.76k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31.53k
84.06k (x2.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.94k
16.71k (x1.87)
TOTAL
164.31k
271.76k (x1.65)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-9700F
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
16.8k
24.18k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
24.08k
23.85k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
14.42k (x2.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.98k
14.87k (x1.06)
TOTAL
60.93k
77.32k (x1.27)

Multithread

i7-9700F

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
92.79k
122.98k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
135.13k
168.77k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.29k
96.11k (x2.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.64k
16.32k (x1.89)
TOTAL
269.85k
404.19k (x1.5)

Performance/W
i7-9700F
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1428 points/W
1051 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2079 points/W
1443 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
512 points/W
821 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
133 points/W
140 points/W
TOTAL
4152 points/W
3455 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9700F
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3575 points/GHz
5496 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5124 points/GHz
5420 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1290 points/GHz
3277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2975 points/GHz
3380 points/GHz
TOTAL
12964 points/GHz
17572 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4