| | | | | | |

Core i7-8750H vs Xeon E5-2667 v3


Description
The i7-8750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8750H gets a score of 231.9 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.5 times faster than the i7-8750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
306f2
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2018
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
53.41k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
231.9k points
343.64k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-8750H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
15.14k
13.1k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
22.8k
11.91k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.5k
4.83k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
3.83k (x0.35)
TOTAL
54.41k
33.68k (x0.62)

Multithread

i7-8750H

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
82.81k
105.42k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
118.58k
109.99k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.08k
44.56k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.86k
17.7k (x3.64)
TOTAL
231.34k
277.66k (x1.2)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8750H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
22.36k
20.99k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
19.33k
11.9k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.4k
4.72k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.32k
3.75k (x0.51)
TOTAL
53.41k
41.36k (x0.77)

Multithread

i7-8750H

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
103.82k
172.62k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
100.47k
110.03k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.81k
44.06k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.8k
16.93k (x4.46)
TOTAL
231.9k
343.64k (x1.48)

Performance/W
i7-8750H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2307 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2233 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
529 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
5153 points/W
2545 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-8750H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5454 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4714 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1073 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1786 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
13027 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4