Core i7-8750H vs N100
Description
The i7-8750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8750H gets a score of 231.9 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8750H is 2.6 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8750H gets a score of 231.9 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8750H is 2.6 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
b06e0
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Alder Lake-N
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
45 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
53.41k points
36.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
231.9k points
88.29k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.36k
15.23k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
19.33k
11.04k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.4k
5.54k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.32k
4.98k (x0.68)
TOTAL
53.41k
36.79k (x0.69)
Multithread
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
103.82k
37.07k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
100.47k
32.57k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.81k
14.75k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.8k
3.9k (x1.03)
TOTAL
231.9k
88.29k (x0.38)
Performance/W
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2307 points/W
6178 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2233 points/W
5429 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
529 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
649 points/W
TOTAL
5153 points/W
14715 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
5454 points/GHz
4479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4714 points/GHz
3247 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1073 points/GHz
1631 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1786 points/GHz
1464 points/GHz
TOTAL
13027 points/GHz
10821 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4