Core i7-8750H vs i7-860
Description
The i7-8750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-860 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8750H gets a score of 52.2 k points while the i7-860 gets 49.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8750H is 1.1 times faster than the i7-860 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8750H gets a score of 52.2 k points while the i7-860 gets 49.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8750H is 1.1 times faster than the i7-860 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
106e5
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Lynnfield
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
LGA 1156
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2018
September 2009
Mean monothread perf.
53.41k points
19.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
231.9k points
75.43k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-8750H
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
3.01k
2.15k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
11.68k
4.87k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
2.82k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.64k
3.13k (x0.55)
TOTAL
24.12k
12.97k (x0.54)
Multithread
i7-8750H
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
7.4k
8.24k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
29.99k
21.63k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.66k
14.65k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.12k
5.02k (x0.98)
TOTAL
52.18k
49.54k (x0.95)
Performance/W
i7-8750H
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
165 points/W
87 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
667 points/W
228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
215 points/W
154 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
114 points/W
53 points/W
TOTAL
1160 points/W
521 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-8750H
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
734 points/GHz
620 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2850 points/GHz
1405 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
922 points/GHz
814 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1377 points/GHz
902 points/GHz
TOTAL
5883 points/GHz
3741 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4