| | | | | | |

Core i7-8750H vs Ryzen 7 5800U


Description
The i7-8750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 5800U is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8750H gets a score of 231.9 k points while the 5800U gets 314.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800U is 1.4 times faster than the i7-8750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
a50f00
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
53.41k points
71.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
231.9k points
314.55k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8750H
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.36k
18.34k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
19.33k
22.78k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.4k
9.45k (x2.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.32k
20.59k (x2.81)
TOTAL
53.41k
71.16k (x1.33)

Multithread

i7-8750H

5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
103.82k
102.74k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
100.47k
143.27k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.81k
58.13k (x2.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.8k
10.41k (x2.74)
TOTAL
231.9k
314.55k (x1.36)

Performance/W
i7-8750H
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
2307 points/W
6849 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2233 points/W
9551 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
529 points/W
3875 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
694 points/W
TOTAL
5153 points/W
20970 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-8750H
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
5454 points/GHz
4168 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4714 points/GHz
5178 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1073 points/GHz
2147 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1786 points/GHz
4679 points/GHz
TOTAL
13027 points/GHz
16172 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4