| | | | | | |

Core i7-8750H vs Ryzen 5 4500U


Description
The i7-8750H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 4500U is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8750H gets a score of 231.9 k points while the 4500U gets 194.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-8750H is 1.2 times faster than the 4500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
860f01
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/6
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
53.41k points
52.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
231.9k points
194.34k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8750H
4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.36k
15.37k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
19.33k
23.02k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.4k
7.74k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.32k
6.32k (x0.86)
TOTAL
53.41k
52.44k (x0.98)

Multithread

i7-8750H

4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
103.82k
52.52k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
100.47k
99.84k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.81k
36.42k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.8k
5.56k (x1.46)
TOTAL
231.9k
194.34k (x0.84)

Performance/W
i7-8750H
4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
2307 points/W
3502 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2233 points/W
6656 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
529 points/W
2428 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
370 points/W
TOTAL
5153 points/W
12956 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-8750H
4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
5454 points/GHz
3842 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4714 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1073 points/GHz
1935 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1786 points/GHz
1579 points/GHz
TOTAL
13027 points/GHz
13111 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4