| | | | | | |

Core i7-8700k vs i5-11300H


Description
The i7-8700k is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8700k gets a score of 443.8 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-8700k is 1.6 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
806c1
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Tiger Lake H35
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2017
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
80.6k points
63.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
443.77k points
285.75k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8700k
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
31.2k
25.83k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
27.82k
23.56k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.57k
9.2k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
15k
5.06k (x0.34)
TOTAL
80.6k
63.64k (x0.79)

Multithread

i7-8700k

i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
202.42k
116.87k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
186.33k
121.08k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.96k
41.8k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.05k
6k (x0.6)
TOTAL
443.77k
285.75k (x0.64)

Performance/W
i7-8700k
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
2131 points/W
3339 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1961 points/W
3459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
473 points/W
1194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
171 points/W
TOTAL
4671 points/W
8164 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-8700k
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6639 points/GHz
5870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5919 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1397 points/GHz
2090 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3192 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
TOTAL
17148 points/GHz
14465 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4