Core i7-8700 vs Xeon W3520
Description
The i7-8700 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the W3520 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8700 gets a score of 310.2 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8700 is 4.2 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8700 gets a score of 310.2 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8700 is 4.2 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
106a5
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Nehalem-WS
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
2.933 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
6/12
4 /8
TDP
65 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2017
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
75.01k points
17.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
388.95k points
73.16k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-8700
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
16.45k
7.35k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
23.74k
4.89k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.24k
2.9k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.43k
2.82k (x0.21)
TOTAL
59.86k
17.96k (x0.3)
Multithread
i7-8700
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
100.94k
29.69k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
159.09k
22.26k (x0.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.61k
14.91k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.59k
6.29k (x0.96)
TOTAL
310.23k
73.16k (x0.24)
Performance/W
i7-8700
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
1553 points/W
228 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2447 points/W
171 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
671 points/W
115 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
4773 points/W
563 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-8700
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
3577 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5160 points/GHz
1669 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2921 points/GHz
960 points/GHz
TOTAL
13014 points/GHz
6123 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4