Core i7-8650U vs Xeon E5-2690 v3
Description
The i7-8650U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5-2690 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8650U gets a score of 173.5 k points while the E5-2690 v3 gets 1016.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 v3 is 5.9 times faster than the i7-8650U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8650U gets a score of 173.5 k points while the E5-2690 v3 gets 1016.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 v3 is 5.9 times faster than the i7-8650U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
306f2
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
15 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
30720 kB
Date
August 2017
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
55.86k points
40.71k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.49k points
1016.36k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8650U
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
21.61k
20.96k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
19.69k
11.74k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
4.61k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.95k
3.4k (x0.34)
TOTAL
55.86k
40.71k (x0.73)
Multithread
i7-8650U
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
78.38k
531.68k (x6.78)
Test#2 (FP)
72.02k
342.28k (x4.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.95k
133.22k (x7.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.15k
9.19k (x1.5)
TOTAL
173.49k
1016.36k (x5.86)
Performance/W
i7-8650U
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5225 points/W
3938 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4802 points/W
2535 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1130 points/W
987 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
410 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
11566 points/W
7529 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-8650U
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5146 points/GHz
5988 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4689 points/GHz
3356 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1097 points/GHz
1318 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2368 points/GHz
971 points/GHz
TOTAL
13300 points/GHz
11632 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4